Skip to main content

Table 3 Synthesis of cost-effectiveness analysis results and COMER outcomes

From: Synthesized economic evidence on the cost-effectiveness of screening familial hypercholesterolemia

Category

References

Incremental costs(2023 US dollar)

Incremental effects

Total ICER(2023 US dollar)

NHB(2023 US dollar)

NHB < 0(%)

Weight (%)

CS(QALY)

Kerr [24]

4,702.79

0.48

49,630(37,223 to 62,038)

19,648

NHB > 0

0.4734

Ademi [40]

− 852.31

1.07

23,369

NHB > 0

0.3346

Ademi [42]

84,620.28

29.07

57,823

NHB > 0

0.0547

Lázaro [31]

39,591,894.47

767

547,516

NHB > 0

0.0006

Ademi [32]

31,369.18

2.53

36,563

NHB > 0

0.1367

 

\(\Sigma \omega *c\)=34,991

\(\Sigma \omega *e\)=2.99

TNHB = 25,614(19,210 to 32,017)

TNHB > 0

\(\Sigma w\)=1

CS(LYG)

Ademi [40]

− 852.31

0.97

4,451(3,338 to 5,564)

21,264

NHB > 0

0.225

Ademi [42]

84,620.28

24.95

37,634

NHB > 0

0.0718

Oliva [34]

8,922.69

1.34

17,108

NHB > 0

0.3477

Wonderling [35]

11,433.06

0.9

20,539

NHB > 0

0.2412

Ademi [32]

31,369.18

2.28

29,851

NHB > 0

0.1142

 

\(\Sigma \omega *c\)=15,331

\(\Sigma \omega *e\)=2.95

TNHB = 21,801(16,351 to 27,251)

TNHB > 0

\(\Sigma w\)=1

CS (adverse events averted)

Kerr [24]

4,702.79

104

406,03(30,452 to 50,753)

5,271,321

NHB > 0

0.0092

Ademi [40]

− 852.31

24.2

510,117

NHB > 0

0.9795

Lázaro [31]

39,591,894.47

847

4,734,156

NHB > 0

0.0114

 

\(\Sigma \omega *c\)=449,450

\(\Sigma \omega *e\)=34.29

TNHB = 601,825(451,368 to 752,281)

TNHB > 0

\(\Sigma w\)=1

CS (deaths averted)

Kerr [24]

4,702.79

16

179,369(134,526 to 224,211)

806,993

NHB > 0

0.0377

Marks [28]

101,486,932.5

560

− 64,766,053

NHB < 0

0.000005

Ademi [40]

− 852.31

7.55

159,735

NHB > 0

0.9633

Lázaro [31]

39,591,894.47

203

− 28,968,295

NHB < 0

0.00003

 

\(\Sigma \omega *c\)=1,110

\(\Sigma \omega *e\)=7.88

TNHB = 182,905(137,178 to 228,631)

TNHB > 0

\(\Sigma w\)=1

US(QALY)

Marquina [30]

1,061,544,599.77

51,790

20,860(15,645 to 26,075)

854,219,290

NHB > 0

0.00004

Spencer [19]

20,836,899.42

97.5

− 5,599,989

NHB < 0

0.99996

 

Σω*c = 20,881,624

\(\Sigma \omega *e\)=99.72

TNHB = − 5,563,039(− 6,953,798 to − 4,172,279)

TNHB < 0

\(\Sigma w\)=1

US (deaths averted)

Marks [28]

13,500,753.09

11.7

832,917(624,687 to 1,041,146)

− 12,733,549

NHB < 0

0.99998

Marquina [30]

1,061,544,599.77

1,279

− 1,014,233,111

NHB < 0

0.00002

 

\(\Sigma \omega *c\)=13,665,924

\(\Sigma \omega *e\)=11.9

TNHB = − 12,891,385(− 16,114,231 to − 9,668,539)

TNHB < 0

\(\Sigma w\)=1

US(LYG)

Marquina [30]

1,061,544,599.77

33,488

32,262(24,197 to 40,328)

177,210,008

NHB > 0

0.004

Spencer [19]

20,836,899.42

61.5

− 11,225,925

NHB < 0

0.996

 

\(\Sigma \omega *c\)=24,996,554

\(\Sigma \omega *e\)=195.1

TNHB = − 10,472,757(− 13,090,946 to − 7,854,568)

TNHB < 0

\(\Sigma w\)=1

  1. CS: Cascade screening; US: Universal screening; ω: weigh; Σω*c: The weighted sum of costs; NHB: Net health benefit; TNHB: Total health benefit; LYG: Life years gained; QALY: Quality-adjusted life years; CE: Events averted