Skip to main content

Table 2 Mixed effects logistic regression of vanguard WEE on physical IPV, sexual IPV, and partner control, marginal effects, weighted

From: Does going against the norm on women’s economic participation increase intimate partner violence risk? A cross-sectional, multi-national study

 

Past-year physical IPV

Past-year sexual IPV

Current partner control

Marginal effect (95% CI)

Marginal Prob

Marginal effect (95% CI)

Marginal Prob

Marginal effect (95% CI)

Marginal Prob

Vanguard WEE items+

0

Ref

0.15

Ref

0.05

Ref

0.38

1

0.014*** (0.007, 0.021)

0.17

0.010*** (0.005, 0.014)

0.06

0.021*** (0.011, 0.032)

0.40

2

0.020*** (0.010, 0.030)

0.17

0.012*** (0.005, 0.019)

0.07

0.033*** (0.021, 0.045)

0.41

 ≥ 3

0.037*** (0.022, 0.051)

0.19

0.027*** (0.017, 0.037)

0.08

0.058*** (0.040, 0.076)

0.44

WEE items

Cont

 − 0.011*** (− 0.014, − 0.008)

–

 − 0.005*** (− 0.008, − 0.002)

–

 − 0.014*** (− 0.018, − 0.009)

–

Obvs

184,621

 

170,555

 

184,725

 
  1. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
  2. Logistic mixed effects models account for survey weighting, country fixed effects, strata and community random intercepts, adjust for total WEE items (shown in table), age, age of marriage, parity, wealth, rurality, country GDP, and random slopes for vanguard across communities
  3. +Number of items vanguard; vanguard on an item if has the item and lives in a community where the item prevalence is < 35% or lives in a community with prevalence ≥ 35% and ≤ 65% and community’s prevalence is in the bottom two thirds of the community-level distribution within the community
Back to article page

Global Health Research and Policy

ISSN: 2397-0642

Contact us